I mention it … because of something funny I saw on Facebook, yesterday.
I’m in a Star Trek group: where members post frequently.
One member told us of how he and his young daughter were at a convention.
Queuing up to get their picture taken with actress, Christina Chong: Security Chief La’an Noonien Singh, in other words.
Apparently? One of the daughter’s favourite episodes was “The Elysian Kingdom”: the one where — as the daughter put it — “the strong girl turned in to a princess!”
That … ?
Well, that put a smile on my face: especially as it’s a very good description of the character!
When’s she’s not holding a toy dog!
~≈Ë≈~
Let’s move on, shall we?
Yesterday’s Teaser saw Mum*, Olga† and Debbi‡ putting in their answers: with Olga scoring ten out of ten, Debbi on nine, and Mum on eight.
† It’s funny you should mention things that get stuck in drawers, Olga … ! (I’m half convinced Sir Terry must have had a bottle of Sant Sadurní d’Anoia at some point … !)
And you’re right: it would make for an interesting movie: it worked with King of Thieves, after all! (I should pencil in The Lavender Hill Mob, I know that: I’ve seen the original Lady Killers.)
‡ A habit of ten question sets, Debbi? Or sets about heists? :D At any rate, the next one’s on the 31st March.
Q5) promulgated I think any Ealing Comedy is worth a watch, Paul. I remember Passport to Pimlico with fondness, although it had nothing to do with crimes, although it makes one think...
Once again your scoring is wrong. It was a 10 question set and you said every one got five out of five. Well I make yesterdays scores 1 person on 10 points and 2 on 9 points. Check your work before releasing it.
Debbi got nine: as she got q9 wrong: mixing up Brazil — the defending champions — instead of England, the tournaments winner. (Brazil were the holders at the tournament: having won in ’62.)
Mum actually got eight: putting 1983 for q1, instead of 1966, and ‘blackmail letter’ for q7: rather than — as Olga and Debbi put — ‘ransom demand.’
I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) 1804
ReplyDeleteQ2) France
Q3) civil laws
Q4) Napóleon Bonaparte
Q5) promulgated
I think any Ealing Comedy is worth a watch, Paul. I remember Passport to Pimlico with fondness, although it had nothing to do with crimes, although it makes one think...
Once again your scoring is wrong. It was a 10 question set and you said every one got five out of five. Well I make yesterdays scores 1 person on 10 points and 2 on 9 points. Check your work before releasing it.
ReplyDelete1 1804
ReplyDelete2 France
3 Civil laws
4 Napoleon Bonarparte
5 Promiugated
That’s where we were both wrong, Trevor!
ReplyDeleteDebbi got nine: as she got q9 wrong: mixing up Brazil — the defending champions — instead of England, the tournaments winner. (Brazil were the holders at the tournament: having won in ’62.)
Mum actually got eight: putting 1983 for q1, instead of 1966, and ‘blackmail letter’ for q7: rather than — as Olga and Debbi put — ‘ransom demand.’
Oh, you know how I feel about 10 question sets. :)
ReplyDeleteHeists are fine.
1. 1804
2. France
3. civil laws
4. Napoleon Bonaparte
5. promulgated
They follow the Napoleonic civil laws in Louisiana. Unsurprisingly, I guess. :)